endobj The traffic climate in china: the mediating effect of traffic safety climate between personality and dangerous driving behavior, Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Careers, Edited by: Jun Yang, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, United States, Reviewed by: Jorge Linuesa-Langreo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain; Magdaline Enow Mbi Tarkang Mary, Istanbul University, Turkey, This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology. Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
Detailed subject information is shown in Table 1. The second wave of data collection consisted of surveying the direct leaders of the participants, who were required to complete the safety participation sections, i.e., to rate the safety participation of the participants in the survey. trailer However, its impact on employee safety behavior is unknown. In the first step, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to confirm the validity and reliability of the measurement model. When leaders care about the lives and work of subordinates, the subordinates are thankful for gratitude. Subordinates will internalize the goals of an organization, spend more time on work, and demonstrate more safety behaviors in order to reward the care and concern of leaders. Previous studies have shown that leaders influence subordinates through job stress, safety climate, and safety motivation (Kim and Jung, 2019; Xue et al., 2020; Basahel, 2021). /Type /Annot The scale has seven questions, and includes the following: My supervisor helps me solve my work problems and My supervisor understands my work problems and needs. The drivers responded to these items using a seven-point Likert scale [strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7)]. Second, this study reveals the influence mechanism of paternalistic leadership on safety participation based on the social exchange theory.
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. National Library of Medicine Besides, managers should adopt a benevolence and morality style, demonstrating more shien (favor granting) and shude (setting an example) behaviors to create high-quality relationships, thus improving safety participation. Correlation and Multiple, The objective of the research is to identify the impact of Paternalistic Leadership (PL) on Job Attitudes (JA) in terms of Job Satisfaction (JS) and Organizational Commitment (OC) at Sadat City, Abstract Leadership practices/styles remain a key focus for organizational researchers from decades. Shen Y., Ju C., Koh T. Y., Rowlinson S., Bridge A. J.
A total of 700 drivers were randomly selected between September 2019 and January 2020 from eight Chinese railway companies located in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hohhot, Zhengzhou, Wuhan, Taiyuan, and Kunming, China, with guarantee of anonymity and confidentiality. Therefore, LMX did mediate the effect of benevolent leadership and moral leadership on safety participation.
/H /I JFIF ` ` C Chou W. J., Sibley C. G., Liu J. H., Lin T. T., Cheng B. S. (2015). Some studies have reported on the relationship between leadership and occupational safety outcomes, such as safety climate, safety consciousness, and safety behaviors, in the construction, mining, manufacturing, and petrochemical industries, indicating the importance of leadership in organizational management (Hofmann et al., 2003; Zohar and Luria, 2010; Conchie, 2013; Kim and Jung, 2019). %PDF-1.5
<<
sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Therefore, a manager should establish a high LMX relationship with subordinates, such as compassion, emotional care, rewards, and praise. This study indicated that LMX mediates the relationship between paternalistic leadership style and employee safety participation.
Third, future studies should explore the impact of paternalistic leadership on other dimensions of safety behaviors, such as safety compliance, and compare it with the effect on safety participation to further clarify the relationship between paternalistic leadership and safety behavior. Therefore, the negative impact of authoritarian leadership was significantly reduced in this study. Moral leadership was also positively related to safety participation ( = 0.291, p < 0.001), supporting Hypothesis 1b.
Demographic characteristics of employees are often used as control variables in paternalistic leadership analysis. The site is secure.
/Height 512 Hypothesis 2a: LMX mediates the relationship between benevolent leadership and safety participation.
Leaders and subordinates have an asymmetric superior-inferior relation, causing fear and caution, thus greatly reducing the identification of employees with the organization. 5 point likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) was used.
Benevolent leadership, such as paying attention to the teaching, care, concern, and compassion of subordinates, promotes a high-quality exchange relationship. In contrast, the authority and absolute control of authoritarian leadership may hinder the establishment of LMX. Social exchange includes instrumental exchange and emotional exchange (Befu, 1977; Cropanzano and Mitchell, 2005; Kim and Qu, 2020).
Learn more The more active the interaction between the leader and driver, the higher the satisfaction of the driver with the work, work environment, and organizational environment, thus promoting safety participation.
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. For instance, universal paternalistic leadership substantially impacts the behavior of individuals in Asia.
Structural model with LMX. 0000002406 00000 n
Employers learn from morally upright managers, and managers can fairly evaluate the behavior of employees. government site.
This discovery is different from that of Chen (2017) regarding the influences of authority conduct on safety behavior of employees. Curcuruto M., Conchie S. M., Mariani M. G., Violante F. S. (2015). The Benevolence and Virtue performance of the superior leader in daily work promotes a positive relationship with employees, i.e., LMX, reducing the leadership gap between managers and employees. Most (60.4%) had not <10 years of train-driving experience (SD = 0.97 years).
This study analyzed the structural models to confirm the proposed hypotheses using a maximum likelihood estimation method. The With an approach similar to patriarchy, PL entails an evident and powerful authority that shows, By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our. Managers should not adopt an authoritarian leadership style, since it does not affect safety participation.
All the participants were male with a mean age of 34.96 years (SD = 5.24 years).
Benevolent leadership has high LMX, which positively affects safety participation. << Thus, we suggest the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 2: LMX mediates the relationship between paternalistic leadership and safety participation.
Benevolent leadership had a positive effect on safety participation ( = 0.313, p < 0.001), supporting Hypothesis 1a.
organizational culture, International Journal of Organizational Leadership (IJOL), Integrating Libertarian Paternalism Into Paternalistic Leadership: The Choice Architecture of H. J. Heinz.
Two to Tango? /C [0 1 1] Fifth, this study focused on paternalistic leadership and safety participation in HSR, a more hierarchical culture than most industries. 0000003184 00000 n The data were collected in two stages. In recent years, several studies have shown that organizational and managerial factors are essential in safety participation, with some studies identifying the role of leadership style. Hansen S., Alge B., Brown M., Jackson C., Dunford B. 0000001066 00000 n
0000001258 00000 n Therefore, paternalistic leadership directly affects safety participation and indirectly affects safety participation through LMX (social exchange mechanism). However, the out-group are other employees who only receive relevant support as per the employment contract. 4 0 obj
<<069C795B7AC9CD45902418B2B8E208FE>]>> From the previous researches it is speculated that paternalistic leadership and employee outcome have a positive connection.
All of them completed questionnaires independently and were not aware of specific results of each other. Wang Q., Zhou X., Bao J., Zhang X., Ju W. (2020).
Besides, authoritarian leadership is negatively associated with subordinates' work attitudes, such as commitment and satisfaction with team leaders (Karakitapoglu-Aygn et al., 2021). Most of the participants (61.2%) had spent over 3 years with their direct leaders (SD = 0.63 years). The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Paternalistic leadership is superior to Western leadership in Chinese organizations since it is based on the leadership gap.
6 0 obj Although military management is used in Chinese railway companies to control unsafe employee behavior, their management stresses on safety compliance and economic penalties over the development of safety participation among drivers. The social exchange theory shows that the in-group are few trusted employees to whom the leader usually grants more care, support, resources, and opportunities while they also generate positive feedback and reciprocity motivations, showing a high degree of loyalty to the organization or leader (Tarkang et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021). You can download the paper by clicking the button above. The results show that benevolent leadership and moral leadership, the two dimensions of paternalistic leadership, have a significant positive effect on the safety participation of high-speed rail drivers, while authoritarian leadership has no significant effect on the safety participation.
Previous studies have confirmed the effect of differentiated leadership style on employee safety behavior.
stream To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds toupgrade your browser. /Filter /DCTDecode
The drivers were asked to rate the paternalistic leadership of their direct supervisors (mentoring drivers or fleet captains) with 11 items on benevolent leadership, six items on moral leadership, and nine items on authoritarian leadership using a seven-point Likert scale [strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7)]. /Subtype /Link /Type /Action China values interpersonal relationships (Guanxi), where informal relationships help subordinates on formal organizational constraints (Lovett et al., 1999; Lin, 2011).
Li C., Wu A. K., Johnson D. E., Wu M. (2012). 0000004222 00000 n
This study uses a structural equation, The main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the supervisor leadership on employee innovative behavior in manufacturing industry, the interference of the organizational justice, Paternalism is an emerging concept with significant potential for international leadership research.
>> >> The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Hypothesis 1a: Benevolent paternalistic leadership is positively associated with safety participation.
An official website of the United States government. (2019).
However, this study also showed that LMX does not mediate authoritarian leadership and safety participation possibly because of the characteristics of employees. Moral leadership emphasizes personal moral integrity, similar to the accessible charm of transformational leadership (Shaw et al., 2020). /C [0 1 1] The .gov means its official.
Descriptive statistics, correlations, and reliabilities for study variables. 0000006409 00000 n
Therefore, we propose that paternalistic leadership will affect the safety participation of HSR drivers. Tang and Naumann (2015) also found that the Chinese no longer have a positive attitude toward authority obedience because of the young generation and social modernization, greatly weakening the social and cultural foundation of authoritarian leadership. Safety-specific transformational and passive leadership influences on firefighter safety climate perceptions and safety behavior outcomes, Paternalistic leadership, subordinate perceived leadermember exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. /Border [0 0 0] Jiang and Probst (2016) explored the impact of transformational leadership and destructive leadership on safety participation of the United States public transport drivers and found that transformational leadership with high safety motivation has a more significant impact on employee safety participation than low safety motivation. Moral leadership involves superior personal qualities, self-discipline, and selflessness, making a leader respected and emulated.
A mediation model linking dispatcher leadership and work ownership with safety climate as predictors of truck driver safety performance, Group leaders as gatekeepers: testing safety climate variations across levels of analysis, Benevolent Leadership Leader-member Exchange Safety Participation, Moral Leadership Leader-member Exchange Safety Participation, Authoritarian Leadership Leader-member Exchange Safety Participation. Paternalistic leadership style is common in Chinese culture, commonly referred to as a style that combines strict discipline, authority, fatherly benevolence, and moral integrity couched in a personalistic atmosphere. Therefore, paternalistic leadership comprises three dimensions: benevolence, morality, and authoritarianism. >> /Subtype /Link High LMX motivates employees, making them committed to safety-related works. In return, subordinates show cognitive reactions, such as considerate in return, identify and imitate, and hold in awe and submit, i.e., shien (granting favors), shude (setting a moral example), and liwei (inspiring awe or fear). endstream endobj 108 0 obj <> endobj 109 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>> endobj 110 0 obj <>stream Hypothesis 2c: LMX mediates the relationship between authoritarian leadership and safety participation. First, this study explores the relationship between paternalistic leadership and employee safety participation in the background of traditional Chinese culture, which enriches and improves the research on leadership and safety participation. >> The, The current study examined the influence of supervisor communicator competence and leadership style on employee job and communication satisfaction. Paternalistic leadership does not treat all subordinates equally, similar to governance and the social exchange theory.
This study's population is all state, The study aimed to determine the relationship between perceptions of management styles and trainers' motivation in the public sports institutions, and to examine the effect of management styles on, This research paper examines the benevolent leadership style and its described as a specialist style that spotlights on having individualized what's more, complete stress to subordinates' near and, The goal of this study was to explore the perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of social work managers regarding their management functions. Moral leadership demands distinguishing between public and private life and setting a good example. (2018) and Nazir et al.
Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? Guo M., Liu S., Chu F., Ye L., Zhang Q.
>> Luria and Yagil (2010) showed that transformational leadership, characterized by a high-quality relationship with subordinates, promotes high group-safety outcomes. 9)cg,[ U`.
An authoritarian leader tends to demand absolute obedience and punishes disobedient employees, resulting in employees being unable to freely choose their work behavior.
/ColorSpace /DeviceRGB
Buengeler C., Piccolo R. F., Locklear L. R. (2021). Cheng B. S., Boer D., Chou L. F., Huang M. P., Yoneyama S., Shim D., et al.. (2014). This study attempts to make three major contributions. Huang Y. H., Verma S. K., Chang W. R., Courtney T. K., Lombardi D. A., Brennan M. J., et al.. (2012).
w !1AQaq"2B #3Rbr Moral leadership and psychological empowerment in China, Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development, Cultural and organizational antecedents of guanxi: the Chinese cases. The role of leader-member exchange in high turnover work environments, The Link Between Leader-Member Exchange, Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Job Satisfaction: A Case Study on Local Government, The impact of superiorsubordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers, Society, Organisations, and Leadership in Turkey, The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organization Citizenship BehaviorThe Mediating Effect of Ethical Climate, F Ntabeni Bhebe Small business leadership in an uncertain environment, Organizational Leadership in the Malaysian Context, The moderating role of organizational culture in the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors, Leadership: Why gender and culture matter, Explicit leader behaviour preferences: Turkish and cross-national sample comparisons, Emotional Intelligence Compatibility and Leader-Member Exchange, MEMBERS, LEADERS AND THE TEAM: EXTENDING LMX TO CO-WORKER RELATIONSHIPS, LMX quality, supervisory communication and team-oriented commitment A multilevel analysis approach, Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The age, education, working time, and the time spent of the drivers with their direct supervisor were noted, similar to previous research (Wei et al., 2016). Lin W., Ma J., Zhang Q., Li J. C., Jiang F. (2018). Leadermember exchange refers to the relationship quality between leaders and employees at the psychological or interpersonal level (Graen et al., 1986).
HSR drivers are crucial in railway operation systems, since they significantly impact railway safety (Davey et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2016). In light of the above discussion, the following hypotheses can be stated: Hypothesis 1: Paternalistic leadership is related to safety participation.
Furthermore, this study also found that LMX mediates benevolent leadership, moral leadership, and safety participation, consistent with Lin et al. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Benevolent leadership indicates the comprehensive concern of leaders for personal lives and the welfare of subordinates, specifically in individual care and forgiveness.
Detailed subject information is shown in Table 1. The second wave of data collection consisted of surveying the direct leaders of the participants, who were required to complete the safety participation sections, i.e., to rate the safety participation of the participants in the survey. trailer However, its impact on employee safety behavior is unknown. In the first step, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to confirm the validity and reliability of the measurement model. When leaders care about the lives and work of subordinates, the subordinates are thankful for gratitude. Subordinates will internalize the goals of an organization, spend more time on work, and demonstrate more safety behaviors in order to reward the care and concern of leaders. Previous studies have shown that leaders influence subordinates through job stress, safety climate, and safety motivation (Kim and Jung, 2019; Xue et al., 2020; Basahel, 2021). /Type /Annot The scale has seven questions, and includes the following: My supervisor helps me solve my work problems and My supervisor understands my work problems and needs. The drivers responded to these items using a seven-point Likert scale [strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7)]. Second, this study reveals the influence mechanism of paternalistic leadership on safety participation based on the social exchange theory.
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. National Library of Medicine Besides, managers should adopt a benevolence and morality style, demonstrating more shien (favor granting) and shude (setting an example) behaviors to create high-quality relationships, thus improving safety participation. Correlation and Multiple, The objective of the research is to identify the impact of Paternalistic Leadership (PL) on Job Attitudes (JA) in terms of Job Satisfaction (JS) and Organizational Commitment (OC) at Sadat City, Abstract Leadership practices/styles remain a key focus for organizational researchers from decades. Shen Y., Ju C., Koh T. Y., Rowlinson S., Bridge A. J.
A total of 700 drivers were randomly selected between September 2019 and January 2020 from eight Chinese railway companies located in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hohhot, Zhengzhou, Wuhan, Taiyuan, and Kunming, China, with guarantee of anonymity and confidentiality. Therefore, LMX did mediate the effect of benevolent leadership and moral leadership on safety participation.
/H /I JFIF ` ` C Chou W. J., Sibley C. G., Liu J. H., Lin T. T., Cheng B. S. (2015). Some studies have reported on the relationship between leadership and occupational safety outcomes, such as safety climate, safety consciousness, and safety behaviors, in the construction, mining, manufacturing, and petrochemical industries, indicating the importance of leadership in organizational management (Hofmann et al., 2003; Zohar and Luria, 2010; Conchie, 2013; Kim and Jung, 2019). %PDF-1.5
<<
sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Therefore, a manager should establish a high LMX relationship with subordinates, such as compassion, emotional care, rewards, and praise. This study indicated that LMX mediates the relationship between paternalistic leadership style and employee safety participation.
Third, future studies should explore the impact of paternalistic leadership on other dimensions of safety behaviors, such as safety compliance, and compare it with the effect on safety participation to further clarify the relationship between paternalistic leadership and safety behavior. Therefore, the negative impact of authoritarian leadership was significantly reduced in this study. Moral leadership was also positively related to safety participation ( = 0.291, p < 0.001), supporting Hypothesis 1b.
Demographic characteristics of employees are often used as control variables in paternalistic leadership analysis. The site is secure.
/Height 512 Hypothesis 2a: LMX mediates the relationship between benevolent leadership and safety participation.
Leaders and subordinates have an asymmetric superior-inferior relation, causing fear and caution, thus greatly reducing the identification of employees with the organization. 5 point likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) was used.
Benevolent leadership, such as paying attention to the teaching, care, concern, and compassion of subordinates, promotes a high-quality exchange relationship. In contrast, the authority and absolute control of authoritarian leadership may hinder the establishment of LMX. Social exchange includes instrumental exchange and emotional exchange (Befu, 1977; Cropanzano and Mitchell, 2005; Kim and Qu, 2020).
Learn more The more active the interaction between the leader and driver, the higher the satisfaction of the driver with the work, work environment, and organizational environment, thus promoting safety participation.
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. For instance, universal paternalistic leadership substantially impacts the behavior of individuals in Asia.
Structural model with LMX. 0000002406 00000 n
Employers learn from morally upright managers, and managers can fairly evaluate the behavior of employees. government site.
This discovery is different from that of Chen (2017) regarding the influences of authority conduct on safety behavior of employees. Curcuruto M., Conchie S. M., Mariani M. G., Violante F. S. (2015). The Benevolence and Virtue performance of the superior leader in daily work promotes a positive relationship with employees, i.e., LMX, reducing the leadership gap between managers and employees. Most (60.4%) had not <10 years of train-driving experience (SD = 0.97 years).
This study analyzed the structural models to confirm the proposed hypotheses using a maximum likelihood estimation method. The With an approach similar to patriarchy, PL entails an evident and powerful authority that shows, By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our. Managers should not adopt an authoritarian leadership style, since it does not affect safety participation.
All the participants were male with a mean age of 34.96 years (SD = 5.24 years).
Benevolent leadership has high LMX, which positively affects safety participation. << Thus, we suggest the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 2: LMX mediates the relationship between paternalistic leadership and safety participation.
Benevolent leadership had a positive effect on safety participation ( = 0.313, p < 0.001), supporting Hypothesis 1a.
organizational culture, International Journal of Organizational Leadership (IJOL), Integrating Libertarian Paternalism Into Paternalistic Leadership: The Choice Architecture of H. J. Heinz.
Two to Tango? /C [0 1 1] Fifth, this study focused on paternalistic leadership and safety participation in HSR, a more hierarchical culture than most industries. 0000003184 00000 n The data were collected in two stages. In recent years, several studies have shown that organizational and managerial factors are essential in safety participation, with some studies identifying the role of leadership style. Hansen S., Alge B., Brown M., Jackson C., Dunford B. 0000001066 00000 n
0000001258 00000 n Therefore, paternalistic leadership directly affects safety participation and indirectly affects safety participation through LMX (social exchange mechanism). However, the out-group are other employees who only receive relevant support as per the employment contract. 4 0 obj
<<069C795B7AC9CD45902418B2B8E208FE>]>> From the previous researches it is speculated that paternalistic leadership and employee outcome have a positive connection.
All of them completed questionnaires independently and were not aware of specific results of each other. Wang Q., Zhou X., Bao J., Zhang X., Ju W. (2020).
Besides, authoritarian leadership is negatively associated with subordinates' work attitudes, such as commitment and satisfaction with team leaders (Karakitapoglu-Aygn et al., 2021). Most of the participants (61.2%) had spent over 3 years with their direct leaders (SD = 0.63 years). The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Paternalistic leadership is superior to Western leadership in Chinese organizations since it is based on the leadership gap.
6 0 obj Although military management is used in Chinese railway companies to control unsafe employee behavior, their management stresses on safety compliance and economic penalties over the development of safety participation among drivers. The social exchange theory shows that the in-group are few trusted employees to whom the leader usually grants more care, support, resources, and opportunities while they also generate positive feedback and reciprocity motivations, showing a high degree of loyalty to the organization or leader (Tarkang et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021). You can download the paper by clicking the button above. The results show that benevolent leadership and moral leadership, the two dimensions of paternalistic leadership, have a significant positive effect on the safety participation of high-speed rail drivers, while authoritarian leadership has no significant effect on the safety participation.
Previous studies have confirmed the effect of differentiated leadership style on employee safety behavior.
stream To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds toupgrade your browser. /Filter /DCTDecode
The drivers were asked to rate the paternalistic leadership of their direct supervisors (mentoring drivers or fleet captains) with 11 items on benevolent leadership, six items on moral leadership, and nine items on authoritarian leadership using a seven-point Likert scale [strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7)]. /Subtype /Link /Type /Action China values interpersonal relationships (Guanxi), where informal relationships help subordinates on formal organizational constraints (Lovett et al., 1999; Lin, 2011).
Li C., Wu A. K., Johnson D. E., Wu M. (2012). 0000004222 00000 n
This study uses a structural equation, The main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the supervisor leadership on employee innovative behavior in manufacturing industry, the interference of the organizational justice, Paternalism is an emerging concept with significant potential for international leadership research.
>> >> The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Hypothesis 1a: Benevolent paternalistic leadership is positively associated with safety participation.
An official website of the United States government. (2019).
However, this study also showed that LMX does not mediate authoritarian leadership and safety participation possibly because of the characteristics of employees. Moral leadership emphasizes personal moral integrity, similar to the accessible charm of transformational leadership (Shaw et al., 2020). /C [0 1 1] The .gov means its official.
Descriptive statistics, correlations, and reliabilities for study variables. 0000006409 00000 n
Therefore, we propose that paternalistic leadership will affect the safety participation of HSR drivers. Tang and Naumann (2015) also found that the Chinese no longer have a positive attitude toward authority obedience because of the young generation and social modernization, greatly weakening the social and cultural foundation of authoritarian leadership. Safety-specific transformational and passive leadership influences on firefighter safety climate perceptions and safety behavior outcomes, Paternalistic leadership, subordinate perceived leadermember exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. /Border [0 0 0] Jiang and Probst (2016) explored the impact of transformational leadership and destructive leadership on safety participation of the United States public transport drivers and found that transformational leadership with high safety motivation has a more significant impact on employee safety participation than low safety motivation. Moral leadership involves superior personal qualities, self-discipline, and selflessness, making a leader respected and emulated.
A mediation model linking dispatcher leadership and work ownership with safety climate as predictors of truck driver safety performance, Group leaders as gatekeepers: testing safety climate variations across levels of analysis, Benevolent Leadership Leader-member Exchange Safety Participation, Moral Leadership Leader-member Exchange Safety Participation, Authoritarian Leadership Leader-member Exchange Safety Participation. Paternalistic leadership style is common in Chinese culture, commonly referred to as a style that combines strict discipline, authority, fatherly benevolence, and moral integrity couched in a personalistic atmosphere. Therefore, paternalistic leadership comprises three dimensions: benevolence, morality, and authoritarianism. >> /Subtype /Link High LMX motivates employees, making them committed to safety-related works. In return, subordinates show cognitive reactions, such as considerate in return, identify and imitate, and hold in awe and submit, i.e., shien (granting favors), shude (setting a moral example), and liwei (inspiring awe or fear). endstream endobj 108 0 obj <> endobj 109 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>> endobj 110 0 obj <>stream Hypothesis 2c: LMX mediates the relationship between authoritarian leadership and safety participation. First, this study explores the relationship between paternalistic leadership and employee safety participation in the background of traditional Chinese culture, which enriches and improves the research on leadership and safety participation. >> The, The current study examined the influence of supervisor communicator competence and leadership style on employee job and communication satisfaction. Paternalistic leadership does not treat all subordinates equally, similar to governance and the social exchange theory.
This study's population is all state, The study aimed to determine the relationship between perceptions of management styles and trainers' motivation in the public sports institutions, and to examine the effect of management styles on, This research paper examines the benevolent leadership style and its described as a specialist style that spotlights on having individualized what's more, complete stress to subordinates' near and, The goal of this study was to explore the perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of social work managers regarding their management functions. Moral leadership demands distinguishing between public and private life and setting a good example. (2018) and Nazir et al.
Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? Guo M., Liu S., Chu F., Ye L., Zhang Q.
>> Luria and Yagil (2010) showed that transformational leadership, characterized by a high-quality relationship with subordinates, promotes high group-safety outcomes. 9)cg,[ U`.
An authoritarian leader tends to demand absolute obedience and punishes disobedient employees, resulting in employees being unable to freely choose their work behavior.
/ColorSpace /DeviceRGB
Buengeler C., Piccolo R. F., Locklear L. R. (2021). Cheng B. S., Boer D., Chou L. F., Huang M. P., Yoneyama S., Shim D., et al.. (2014). This study attempts to make three major contributions. Huang Y. H., Verma S. K., Chang W. R., Courtney T. K., Lombardi D. A., Brennan M. J., et al.. (2012).
w !1AQaq"2B #3Rbr Moral leadership and psychological empowerment in China, Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development, Cultural and organizational antecedents of guanxi: the Chinese cases. The role of leader-member exchange in high turnover work environments, The Link Between Leader-Member Exchange, Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Job Satisfaction: A Case Study on Local Government, The impact of superiorsubordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers, Society, Organisations, and Leadership in Turkey, The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organization Citizenship BehaviorThe Mediating Effect of Ethical Climate, F Ntabeni Bhebe Small business leadership in an uncertain environment, Organizational Leadership in the Malaysian Context, The moderating role of organizational culture in the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors, Leadership: Why gender and culture matter, Explicit leader behaviour preferences: Turkish and cross-national sample comparisons, Emotional Intelligence Compatibility and Leader-Member Exchange, MEMBERS, LEADERS AND THE TEAM: EXTENDING LMX TO CO-WORKER RELATIONSHIPS, LMX quality, supervisory communication and team-oriented commitment A multilevel analysis approach, Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The age, education, working time, and the time spent of the drivers with their direct supervisor were noted, similar to previous research (Wei et al., 2016). Lin W., Ma J., Zhang Q., Li J. C., Jiang F. (2018). Leadermember exchange refers to the relationship quality between leaders and employees at the psychological or interpersonal level (Graen et al., 1986).
HSR drivers are crucial in railway operation systems, since they significantly impact railway safety (Davey et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2016). In light of the above discussion, the following hypotheses can be stated: Hypothesis 1: Paternalistic leadership is related to safety participation.
Furthermore, this study also found that LMX mediates benevolent leadership, moral leadership, and safety participation, consistent with Lin et al. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Benevolent leadership indicates the comprehensive concern of leaders for personal lives and the welfare of subordinates, specifically in individual care and forgiveness.